政治嵌入度与自主创新绩效的悖论关系分析  

Analysis on the paradox of political embeddedness and independent technology innovation

作　　者：苏敬勤 刘畅 SU Jing-qin;LIU Chang(Faculty of Management and Economics,Dalian University of Technology Dalian,Dalian 116024,China)

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学管理与经济学部,辽宁大连116024

出　　处：《科学学研究》2019年第2期375-384,共10页Studies in Science of Science

基　　金：国家自然科学基金重点项目(71632004);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(15JJD630004);基本科研业务费项目(DUT17RW226)

摘　　要：基于我国国有企业在具备优势条件下技术自主创新绩效却低于民营企业这一现象,通过对上汽集团及吉利集团的企业年报进行扎根分析,辨识两种不同政治嵌入度的企业的注意力视角及配置,探究其配置机制与特征,进而阐释其对企业创新行为与绩效的影响。研究发现:(1)不同政治嵌入度的企业的注意力视角是相同的,包括市场、政策、员工及技术。但受外部制度要求、组织身份及企业目标的影响,二者的注意力配置机制及模式不同;(2)注意力配置的基本原则是相同的,即与企业效益相符;(3)企业的政治嵌入程度与企业对政策导向的关注度可能呈现非正相关关系。注意力在政治嵌入度与企业行为及绩效间起调节变量的作用。因此,较高的政治嵌入程度以及由此获得的优势条件不能作为评判企业是否具备高创新绩效的依据。Based on the fact that the performance of independent innovation of state-owned enterprises( SOEs) is lower than private enterprises,this article uses grounded theory approach on the annual report of SAIC Motor and Geely to identify the attention perspective and allocation of these two different political embedded enterprises,and explore the allocation mechanism and characteristics in order to explain its effect on technology innovation performance. The result shows that,firstly,the attention perspectives of different political embedded enterprises are the same,which include market,policy,employee and technology. Secondly,the basic allocating rules are the same which confirms to the enterprises’ benefit. Thirdly,the correlation between political embeddedness and the enterprises’ attention to policy may not be positive. Furthermore,organization attention plays a moderating role on the relationship between political embeddedness degree and technology innovation performance.

关 键 词：政治嵌入度 企业注意力 技术自主创新 

分 类 号：F273.1[经济管理—企业管理]