中文版流畅体验量表的初探  

A Study on the Chinese Version of the Flow State Scale

作　　者：於佩红[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江旅游职业学院

出　　处：《浙江旅游职业学院学报》2009年第2期97-100,共4页Journal of Tourism College of Zhejiang

基　　金：浙江省2008年度教育科学规划课题(SCG230)

摘　　要：目的:通过分析中文版流畅体验量表(FSS)的心理测量学特征来探讨该量表在中国的适用性。方法:对随机抽取的1206名大学生被试进行问卷调查,并对问卷调查结果进行分析。结果:9个分量表的高分组和低分组的得分在0.01水平上差异均显著,各题项与对应分量表之间相关在0.50～0.81之间;分量表的内部一致性系数在0.79～0.85之间,总量表的内部一致性系数为0.93,折半信度为0.88,重测信度为0.82;各分量表之间相关在0.23～0.57之间,分量表与总量表之间相关在0.60～0.85之间,各相关在0.01水平上均显著;探索性因素分析提取的9个因子的累积方差解释率为68.58%,验证性因素分析显示,各项拟合指标良好。结论:中文版流畅体验量表(FSS)具有良好的信度和效度,值得推广试用。Objective:To analyze the Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Flow State Scale (FSS).Method:Collecting and analyzing data of Chinese FSS from random samples consisting of 1206 college students. Results:Exploratory principal factor analysis indicated that the Flow State Scale had nine factors with loadings from 0.50 to 0.81,explaining 68.58% of the total variance; Internal consistency analysis showed that the Cronbach’s alpha of the subscalesand the whole scale were 0.79-0.85 and 0.93; Test-retest correlation coefficient and split-half reliability were 0.82 and 0.88;the correlation coeffcient among the subscales ranged from 0.23 to 0.57 and the correlations between the FSS and the sub-scales were from 0.60 to 0.85; the goodness of fit index indicated a fair structure of the Flow State Scale. Conclusion:theChinese version of the Flow State Scale has good reliability and validity and it’s worthy of spreading.

关 键 词：心理卫生 心理测量学研究 流畅体验量表 

分 类 号：B841.7[哲学宗教—基础心理学]