读《文选》随笔  

Notes on Reading Wen Xuan

作　　者：穆克宏[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学文学院,福建福州350007

出　　处：《江苏大学学报（社会科学版）》2003年第1期80-86,共7页Journal of Jiangsu University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：本文阐释了有关《文选》学的三个方面的问题:其一,回溯了萧统《文选》37种文体之一的"七"作为一种文体的历史及对后世文学的深远影响。其二,对《文选旁证》的作者作了考证,认为其作者为梁章钜。其三,评价了苏轼论《文选》的观点,认为苏轼的评论有其得失。得在指出了萧统的一些错误;失在他从个人喜好出发,未能对《文选》作客观的评论。Three important issues are under discussion in the field of Wen Xuan as a literary genre. First, it traces back to thirtyseven literary forms as demonstrated in Xiao Tong′s Wen Xuan as a point of departure, among which Form Seven ('qi'), that is, any literary form started with Chinese numerical 'seven' becomes the center of discussion. In addition, it places Form Seven in the historical context and discusses its influence on the latter writings. Second, it tries to do meticulous textual criticism about Wen Xuan Pang Zheng and finds it as a serendipitous discovery the original author of the text, Liang Zhangju. Third, it reassesses the views by Su Shi's comments on Wen Xuan: on one hand, Su Shi pointed out the errors made by Xiao Tong; on the other, Su Shi's comments, inevitably tinged with his biases, failed to offer a fair and judicious review.

关 键 词：《文选》 萧统 “七”体 文体 《文选旁证》 梁章钜 苏轼 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]