检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:申卫星[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院博士后流动站
出 处:《法学研究》2003年第2期46-61,共16页Chinese Journal of Law
基 金:教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金;中国博士后科学基金会的资助
摘 要:所有权保留买卖中买受人的法律地位 ,特别是买受人的期待权 ,是学说史一个颇具争议的难题。文章在介绍、评论了德国民法学界和我国学者的各种观点后 ,以“权利分化思想”和“时间区分所有权理论”为分析模型 ,论证了保留买主期待权是一项物权 ,并进一步指出在物权体系中保留买主期待权是一项不完全的所有权 ,而保留卖主所保留之所有权乃是一项担保意义上的所有权 ,保留买主与保留卖主共享保留标的物之所有权。这一结论与传统理论有冲突 ,但这种冲突对于学术发展无疑是有价值的。The buyers legal status in conditional sales, especially the buyers contingent right (das Anwartschaftsrecht) is a very controversial legal issue. The paper introduces and comments on the theories of Muenzel, Blomeyer, Raiser, and Serick, as well as the viewpoints of the relevant Chinese scholars. According to the theory of 'right is divided between buyer and seller' and 'divided property interests with time', the author points out that the legal nature of the buyers contingent right is ownership , although not complete ownership, and that the buyer has the beneficial ownership over the article, the seller has a security ownership over it, and the ownership is divided between the two. Such a result is very different from the traditional theory. However, it is exactly such conflicts that have led to the vigorous development of the legal theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112