检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:洪华芬[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江教育学院,浙江杭州310012
出 处:《浙江教育学院学报》2003年第2期16-21,共6页Journal of ZHEJIANG Education Institute
摘 要:作为刑法的古老原则——罪刑法定原则从一开始出现,人们对它的理解就有形式主义和实质主义之争。形式主义的罪行法定原则因追求法律的尽善尽美而在现实中成为永远无法实现的神话;实质主义的罪刑法定原则因过分批判法律的内客的确定性而形成以司法为中心的畸形的法律制度。有批判地创造性接受这是我们应有的做法。我们不论在立法上还是在实践上都应跳出实质主义和形式主义的窠臼,真正实现罪刑法定原则的价值。Ever since the initiation of this old principle of criminal law - the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specific crime, people have had two distinct understandings of it, namely formalism that has been unrealistic due to its aspiration for a perfect law, and essentialism, which has led to a malformed legal system centered on judicatory due to its strong criticism on the certainty of law. What we should do is to accept with criticism and creativity and jump out of the set patterns of formalism and essentialism both in legislation and in reality to realize the true value contained in the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specific crime.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38