检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁小萍[1] 周立[1] 周雪琴[1] 郑红薇[1] 鲍慧芳[1] 顾丽虹[1] 茅菊平[1] 黄琳淼[1]
出 处:《中华护理杂志》2003年第5期322-324,共3页Chinese Journal of Nursing
基 金:医院护理部和科室科研基金资助项目
摘 要:目的 :探讨粒 -巨噬细胞集落因子 (GM—CSF)悬液应用于血液病化疗所致口腔黏膜炎 (OM )的效果 ,并与常规使用的口腔药膜比较。方法 :随机将 10 0例血液病化疗后发生OM的患者分为两组 ,分别用CM—CSF悬液局涂或予口腔药膜外贴 ,比较两组不同部位和程度的OM的愈合情况。结果 :试验组与对照组在相同部位的Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ度OM的愈合时间上存在显著的差异 (P <0 .0 1) ,对Ⅳ度OM的愈合时间也有差异 (P <0 .0 5 )。两组不同部位的愈合时间顺序无差异 (P >0 .0 5 ) ,唇部OM愈合最早 ,硬腭部OM愈合最晚。结论 :GM—CSF悬液对不同口腔部位Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ及IV度化疗所致的OM的作用明显优于常规的口腔药膜治疗。Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) treatment on hematological patients with chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis and compare with conventional treatment of oral drug membrane. Methods: Randomly divided 100 patients into two groups and treated with GM-CSF mixture or drug membrane. Statistically compared the efficacy of the two groups. Results: There were significant differences between two treatment groups for OM in same location with severity ofⅠ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ (P<0.01) and Ⅳ degrees (P<0.05).There were no significant differences between two groups concerning their OM healing time sequence in different locations (P>0.05). OM in labial area healed fast, while OM in hard palatal area healed slowly. Conclusion: GM-CSF is better than conventional drug membrane for treating chemotherapy induced oral mucositis with severity ofⅠ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ and Ⅳ degree.
关 键 词:血液病 化学疗法 不良反应 口腔黏膜炎 粒-巨噬细胞集落因子
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143