再论所谓“清音浊化”错误的提法  

Another Study Concerning The Wrong Idea About "The Turning Voiceless Consonants Into Voiced

作　　者：王宏军[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东省济宁师范专科学校

出　　处：《基础教育外语教学研究》2003年第3期28-30,共3页Foreign Language Teaching & Research in Basic Education

摘　　要：本文通过对“清音浊化”错误提法的成因分析,从理论和实践上证明了它的错误性;本文还就英汉音位系统进行了对比,并就英语的爆破音谈了发好浊辅音的方法。最后,希望在语言教学中,教师应运用语音学理论,结合实际情况,从理论和实际上区分英语的清、浊辅音的不同。This paper has theoretically and practically proved the incorrectness and analyzed the reasons of the wrong idea about 'turning voiceless consonants into voiced . It has also made the comparison between the Chinese and English phonological systems and has talked about the methods of pronouncing voiced consonants concerning English plosives. Finally, in the process of language teaching, teachers are supposed to utilize some phonetic theory to distinguish theoretically and practically the English voiceless and voiced consonants depending on the actual practice.

关 键 词："清音浊化" 送气 错误分析 英语 浊辅音 语音学 爆破音 

分 类 号：H311[语言文字—英语]