检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《四川医学》2003年第6期628-629,共2页Sichuan Medical Journal
摘 要:目的 比较平扫和增强扫描对周围型肺癌的诊断准确率 ,提高CT医生对孤立性肺结节常规行增强扫描的意识。方法 60例孤立性肺结节灶 ,分别行平扫和增强扫描 ,结节灶中央均加薄层扫描。结果 平扫诊断周围型肺癌误诊率 2 2 % ,漏诊率 32 % ;增强扫描诊断周围型肺癌误诊率 5 7% ,漏诊率 0 ;两者之间有显著差异 (P <0 .0 5)。Objective To st udy the diagnostic accuracy of periphera l lung cancer with enhanced CT campared to normal CT scan.and urge the radiologs t to use enhanced CT scan routinely for solitary lung nodules.Methods 60 cases of solitary lung nodules were scanned by normal and enhanced CT with thine sliced scanning at centre of the lesions.Results The rate of misdiagn osing peripheral lung cancer was 22% wit h normal CT and 5.7% with enhanced one.T he rate of leakage was 32% for the upper and 0% for the latter with significant difference between the two(P<0.05)?Conclusion It is of importan t value of use the features of enhanced CT findings and dynamic enhancing curve to diagnose peripheral lung cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.65