检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国武汉市广州军区武汉总医院眼科,430070
出 处:《国际眼科杂志》2003年第2期18-20,共3页International Eye Science
摘 要:目的 比较脉络膜上腔给药与全身给药治疗眼穿通伤的疗效。方法 16只日本大耳白兔制成双眼穿通伤模型,分为 经脉络膜上腔给药与全身给药两组,经处理后行视网膜脱离及玻璃体浑浊评级、眼底造影及组织病理研究。结果 脉络膜上 腔给药组抑制炎症和增殖反应的效果优于全身给药组。结论 脉络膜上腔给药安全有效,可作为一种新的穿通伤治疗手段。Aim To compare the therapeutic effects of suprachoroidal space drug administration and muscle injection on perforating ocular injury. Methods Sixteen normal rabbits were divided into two groups: A and B. After induction of perforating ocular injury, tri-amcinolone acetonide, 1mg, was administered into suprachoroidal space in Group A and dexamison, 3mg, was given by muscular injection for 3 days in Group B. The effect was measured by the grade of retinal detachment, vitreous body opacification, FFA and histopathology. Results The effect of suprachoroidal space administration was superior to that of muscle injection. Conclusion The suprachoroidal space drug administration is safe and effective and provides a new choice for treating perforating ocular injury.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117