检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马文[1]
出 处:《广东财经大学学报》2015年第6期106-112,共7页Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics
基 金:中央高校基本科研基金(2013221033)
摘 要:我国知识产权刑事保护已经显现出强化趋势。运用沉没成本分析方法对知识产权刑事保护进行经济透视,可以发现:知识产权刑事保护沉没成本不断增加,体现在国家层面的沉没成本效应与反映在被害人层面的沉没成本逆效应共同导致了知识产权刑事保护"形式强化"与"实质弱化"并存的悖离状态。在刑事实体法不断扩张的情境下,根据刑事一体化思维,建议从刑事程序法角度着手,将公诉型的知识产权案件也纳入刑事和解范畴,以降低沉没成本,缓解知识产权刑事保护的现有矛盾。The Criminal protection of intellectual property in China has shown a tendency of strengthening. Using the methods of sunk cost analysis,the paper finds that the sunk cost of intellectual property criminal protection continues to increase and the sunk cost effect at the national level and the sunk cost inverse effect at the victim level lead to the contrary state of intellectual property criminal protection: strengthening in the form but weakening in essence. In the case of the continuous expansion of criminal substantive law,based on the thought of criminal integration,it suggests that intellectual property cases of public prosecution should also be included in the scope of criminal reconciliation,in order to reduce the sunk cost and alleviate the existing contradiction of intellectual property criminal protection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3