检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院,上海200030 [2]上海师范大学法政学院,上海200234
出 处:《上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年第4期60-68,共9页Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:尽管学界对司法中的法律修辞研究日益丰富和深入,但对审判制度的修辞力的研究还鲜有论及。由于对修辞的认识多元而混淆,因此首先需要明确界定;以民诉两审制为例,不同于传统的效率追求为主的单一解释,可以初步看到它所具有的直觉上的正确、司法信任、沟通理解等多方面的修辞力,这对增加司法判决的可接受性有着重要意义;然而在实践之中却也存在着沦为缺乏实效、与逻辑背离的"仅仅是修辞"的迹象与危险。Although studies of legal rhetoric have become increasingly rich and deep among academic circles,studies on rhetorical power of the trial system are still limited.It is necessary to clearly define the multiplex cognition of rhetoric.Taking two-tier trial system of civil proceedings as an example,different from the traditional efficiency-oriented explanation,rhetorical power is embodied in its intuitive correctness,judicial trust and communication,which is of great significance to increase the acceptability of the judicial decision.However,the rhetorical power in practice is at risk of ineffectiveness and even deviation from logic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222