检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柯要军[1] 王强[1] 张杰[1] 龙晶[1] 翁翠萍[1]
出 处:《实用癌症杂志》2015年第5期685-687,共3页The Practical Journal of Cancer
摘 要:目的比较动脉化疗栓塞与动脉灌注化疗治疗进展期宫颈癌的疗效。方法将进展期宫颈癌患者70例纳入研究对象,根据化疗方法不同分为观察组(给予动脉栓塞联合灌注化疗)和对照组(仅给予动脉灌注化疗),比较两组患者的肿瘤分期、血管新生指标、平均生存时间、远期生存情况。结果肿瘤分期:观察组患者TNM分期低于对照组;血管新生指标:观察组VEGFA、VEGFB以及VEGFC含量[(75.31±9.44)、(71.92±9.62)、(59.52±6.13)pg/ml]均低于对照组;生存情况:观察组平均生存时间[(78.65±8.26)个月]、1年、2年、3年生存率(91.43%、82.86%、74.29%)均优于对照组。结论动脉化疗栓塞是治疗进展期宫颈癌的理想方法。Objective To compare the efficacy of arterial chemoembolization and arterial perfusion chemotherapy for advanced cervical cancer. Methods 70 cases of advanced cervical cancer were enrolled and divided into the observation group( arterial chemoembolization) and the control group( arterial perfusion chemotherapy). Tumor stage,angiogenesis index,average survival time,long-term survival between the 2 group s were compared. Results Tumor stage: TNM stage in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group; angiogenesis index: VEGFA,VEGFB and VEGFC content in the observation group were 75. 31 ± 9. 44,71. 92 ± 9. 62,59. 52 ± 6. 13 pg / ml,which were significantly lower than those of the control group; Survival: in the observation group,average survival time was( 78. 65 ± 8. 26) months,1-year,2-year,3-year survival rates were91. 43%,82. 86%,74. 29%,which were significantly higher than those of the control group. Conclusion Arterial chemoembolization is an ideal treatment for advanced cervical cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229