检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:荣见华[1] 姜节胜[2] 胡德文[3] 颜东煌[1] 付俊庆[1]
机构地区:[1]长沙理工大学汽车与机电工程学院,长沙410076 [2]西北工业大学振动工程研究所,西安710072 [3]国防科技大学机电及自动控制学院,长沙410073
出 处:《力学学报》2003年第5期584-591,共8页Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
基 金:国家自然科学基金(10072050);湖南省自然科学基金(01JJY2048)
摘 要:在导出应力灵敏度的基础上,建立了一种改进的基于应力及其灵敏度的结构拓扑双方向渐进优化算法.该方法是对传统ESO和BESO方法的改进和完善.算例表明该方法能较大程度减少解的振荡状态数,获得更佳的拓扑结构.具有概念上的简洁性和应用上的有效性.The evolutionary structural optimisation (ESO) method has been under continuous development since 1992. Originally the method was conceived from the engineering perspective that the topology and shape of structures were naturally conservative for safety reasons and therefore contained an excess of material. To move from the conservative design to a more optimum design would therefore involve the removal of material. The ESO algorithm caters for topology optimisation by allowing the removal of material from all parts of the design space. With appropriate chequer-board controls and controls on the number of cavities formed, the method can reproduce traditional fully stressed topologies, and has been applied into the problems with static stress, stiffness, displacement etc. constraints. If the algorithm was restricted to the removal of surface-only material, then a shape optimisation problem is solved. Recent research (Q. M. Quern) has presented a bi-direction evolutionary structural optimisation (BESO) method whereby material can be added and removed. But the BESO method only consider elements' stress level, does not consider the effect of an element removal or adding on the maximum stress of the optimized structure. In order to improve the BESO method, in this paper, a set of stress sensitivity is introduced and derived at first. Based on stresses and their sensitivity, a procedure for an improved bi-directional structural topology optimization is given. It is the development and modification of the conventional ESO and BESO method. Two examples demonstrate that the proposed method can reduce the solution oscillatory state number, and obtain more optimal structural topology, and it is attractive due to its simplicity in concept and effectiveness in application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249