检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《天津医科大学学报》2003年第3期402-404,共3页Journal of Tianjin Medical University
摘 要:目的 :比较分析MBT直丝弓矫治器临床治疗时间及治疗效果。方法:随机选择43例AngleⅡ类一分类错牙合拔牙矫治的患者。其中16例采用MBT直丝弓矫治器矫治 ,27例采用标准方丝弓矫治器进行矫治 ,通过比较两种不同治疗方法的临床治疗时间及治疗效果 ,分析MBT矫治器的临床矫治步骤和应用特点。结果:MBT矫治技术矫治的患者疗程为18~22月 ,标准方丝弓矫治器为20~28月 ,通过矫治模型Andrews6项牙合标准分析。MBT直丝弓矫治器比标准方丝弓矫治器矫治的病例能取得更理想的牙合关系及准确的牙合位置。结论:MBT直丝弓矫治技术不仅能缩短疗程 。Objective:To Analyze the clinical treatment period and effects of MBT straight wire appliance.Methods:43cases(male24,female19,aged12~18yrs)AngleⅡpatients were chosen.16cases were treated by MBT straight wire appliance,27cases were treated by stanˉdard edgewise technique.Comparing with two methods,the following results was carried out.Results:The period of treatment of MBT straight wire was6~10months,while the standard edgewise technique was8~16months.Employ Andrews's six occlusion standard to analyze the therapeutic effect.It was found that MBT straight wire obtained more ideal occlusion and acˉcurate teeth position than standard edgewise technique.Conclusion:MBT straight wise appliˉances not only shortened the period of treatment,but also gained superior therapeutic effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38