检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李晋[1] 吴其林[1] 刘德贵[1] 杨勇[1] 程崇典[1]
出 处:《成都军区医院学报》2003年第5期18-19,共2页
摘 要:目的 通过乳晕切口与常规乳房放射状切口治疗乳腺良性肿块的疗效分析,比较两种术式的差异。方法于乳晕边缘内设计一弧长不超过乳晕周长1/2的弧形切口或设计一常规乳房放射状切口,切除乳腺良性肿块。结果 手术切口的隐蔽性、乳房的外观、形态及患者的满意度明显优于乳房放射状切口。结论 对于直径<5cm,距乳晕边缘<5cm,年龄40岁以下的乳腺良性肿块宜选择乳晕切口术式治疗。反之应选择常规乳房放射状切口术式治疗。Objective To discuss the curative effect of the surgical operation with areolar incision or routine radial incision in treating benign masses of mammary glands and to compare the differences. Methods The benign masses of mammary glands were removed with arc incisions along the areolar edge with a length shorter than half of the areolar perimeter,or with routine radial incisions . Results Out of the 234 cases of benign masses which were treated surgically, 164 cases were operated on with areolar incisions, the rest with routine radial incisions. Both incisions showed out the same effect in treating benign masses of mammary glands, but the former is superior to the latter in the mask of the incision, the outlood and the shape of the breast, and the satisfaction of the patients. Conclusion Areolar incision can be applied in the removing operations of benign masses with diameter < 0.5 cm and < 0.5 cm away from the areolar edge when the patients are under 40 years old, otherwise routine radial incision should be made.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28