差异与成因:两大法系消极公诉权之评析——兼及我国消极公诉权之完善  

Difference and Cause-Comment upon Negative Right of Prosecufion on Two Legal systems.

作　　者：孙孝福[1] 郭松[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《甘肃政法学院学报》2003年第3期75-81,共7页Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute

摘　　要：消极公诉权在公诉权理论中占有极为重要的地位 ,两大法系都对之作出了积极的肯定 ,并在立法上作出了相应的规定。但是 ,两大法系对消极公诉权的规定又显示出了巨大的差异 ,这种差异是由于两大法系在国家政治哲学、法律传统、诉讼理念等方面的区别而造成的。本文分析了两者的差异 。Negative right of prosecution,which is very important intheory of right of prosecution,has been regarded as positive and provided consequently in common law system and civil caw system.However,their provsions about negative right of prosecution seem quite different,which result rorm their differences in nation philosophy of politics,legal tradifion,lawsilit concept,efc,all which are discussed in the article.

关 键 词：消极公诉权 公诉权理论 中国 诉讼理念 英美法系 大陆法系 刑事司法系统 检察官 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]