检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪义永[1] 林希鸿[1] 吴浩凌[1] 方儒雄[1]
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属第一医院口腔科,福州350005
出 处:《口腔材料器械杂志》2003年第4期178-179,185,共3页Chinese Journal of Dental Materials and Devices
摘 要:目的 研究牙胶尖与扩根器械的匹配情况,为根管充填提供客观依据。方法 取10颗离体前牙自颈部切断,测出每颗离体前牙的断面至根尖的长度,其根部经常规根管预备后,然后插入牙胶尖,再测其进入根管的长度,比较二者的匹配性。结果 扩孔锉与其同一号的牙胶尖的匹配率为16.25%,而与其小一号的牙胶尖的匹配率为86.25%,超填率为5%。结论 与扩孔锉同一号的牙胶尖的匹配率小于小一号的牙胶尖,相同号的牙胶尖之间也存在差异。Objective To investigate the compatibility of the gutta-percha point with dental root-canal enlarging ,offer an objective base for root-canal filling. Methods Ten extrated anterior teeth were cut from their necks. The distance between every section and each point was measured. After the root-canal was regularly prefabricated and the gutta-percha points of different sizes were respectively inserted, the inserting length was measrued.The compatibility between them was compared.Results The Compatibility between root canal file and the gutta-percha point of the same size was 16.25 percent, whereas that between the root canal file and the gutta-percha point of smaller size was 86.5 percent,over filling was 5 precent. Conclusion The compatibility between the root canal file and the gutta-percha of the same size is smaller than that between the same root cannal file and a smaller gutta-percha point ;there exist differences among gutta-percha points of the same size.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117