检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜晓龙[1] 陈敏华[2] 严昆[2] 沈理[2] 戴莹[2] 高文[2]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江省医院超声科,黑龙江哈尔滨150036 [2]北京大学临床肿瘤学院超声科,北京100036
出 处:《中国临床医学影像杂志》2003年第6期398-401,共4页Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
基 金:首都医学发展科研基金项目(ZD199909)。
摘 要:目的:应用新型超声造影剂及超声匹配成像新技术,比较彩超及实时灰阶超声造影两种方法对肝占位性病变的应用价值。方法:对35例肝占位性病变总计77个病灶中的42个重点进行造影观察。结果:彩超造影前后血流增强程度评价差异显著(P<0.001);实时灰阶造影结果显示可明显提高肿瘤的定性诊断率(P<0.001)。本组35例造影前为77个病灶,彩超造影后为77个病灶;而实时灰阶造影后共计发现101个病灶,增加24个(23.8%)。结论:彩超造影可以提高肝占位性病变的血流检出率,有助于诊断;实时灰阶造影不仅可对肝占位性病变作出定性诊断,还能提高病灶的检出率。故灰阶超声造影较彩超造影更为重要。Objective: To compare the characteristics of contrast enhanced color DopplerCECD ultrasound with real time contrast enhanced gray scaleCEGS ultrasound in the detection of focal liver lesions by new contrast agent and contrast tissue imaging(CnTI). Materials and Methods: Forty two of 77 various liver lesions in thirty five patients were studied before and after injection of contrast agent. Results: The blood signal between color Doppler ultrasound and CECD was statistically significantP<0.001. The blood signal grade between color Doppler ultrasound and CEGS was statistically significantP<0.001. 77 lesions were found in 35 cases by color Doppler ultrasound or by CECD, but 101 lesions were discovered by CEGS. Conclusion: CECD could improve the demonstration of blood signal in liver focal lesions and improve diagnosis. CEGS not only could distinguish between malignant and benign focal liver lesions, but also improve the detection rate of liver lesions. So CEGS is more important than CECD in clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117