检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘雨成[1] 孙西军[1] 徐春玲[1] 何银[1] 田岳华[1] 何遂[1] 刘永保[1] 刘淑华[2] 刘海红[2]
机构地区:[1]江苏省连云港市第一人民医院影像科,222002 [2]江苏省连云港市第一人民医院肿瘤实验室,222002
出 处:《临床放射学杂志》2003年第11期924-926,共3页Journal of Clinical Radiology
摘 要:目的 探讨几种常用肿瘤标记物CEA、NSE、LTA检测与影像学诊断对肺癌的检查及病理分型相关研究。资料与方法 选择 190例肺部病变的患者 ,均摄胸部X线平片和CT扫描及肿瘤标记物CEA、NSE、LTA外周血清检测。结果 (1)CT诊断鳞癌 5 0例、腺癌 4 6例、小细胞性未分化癌 14例、良性病变 2 0例、未定型 6 0例。 (2 )三项肿瘤标记物检测水平及敏感性鳞癌LTA为 85 .3% ,腺癌CEA为 86 .9% ,小细胞未分化癌NSE为 93.3%。 (3)影像学诊断与肿瘤标记物相结合 ,定性诊断及病理分型上升率鳞癌为 14 .7% ,腺癌 11.5 % ,小细胞未分化癌为 4 6 .7%。结论 影像学检查与几种常见肿瘤标记物检测结合在肺癌的诊断、病理分型及良恶性病变的鉴别起着重要的作用 。Objective To evaluate several common tumor markers (CEA, NSE, LTA) and imaging exam in the diagnosis and pathologic classification of pulmonary carcinoma.Materials and Methods Plain chest film, CT scanning were taken and peripheral blood CEA, NSE and LTA were estimated in 190 patients with pulmonary lesions. The results were analyzed.Results (1) CT diagnosed 50 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, 46 cases of adenocarcinoma, 14 cases of small cell lung cancer, 20 cases of benign pulmonary lesions and 60 cases of unclassified tumors. (2) The sensitivity of CEA, NSE and LTA for squamous, adenomous and undifferentiated carcinoma was 85.3%, 86.9% and 93.3%, respectively. (3) The qualitative and pathologic classification correctness for squamous, adenomous and undifferentiated carcinoma was respectively 14.7%, 11.5% and 46.7% when combined imaging features with tumor marker results.Conclusion A combination of imaging manifestations with common tumor markers estimation is of great importance in the diagnosis, differentiation and pathologic classification of pulmonary carcinomas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42