文体学流派区分的出发点、参照系和作业面  

Classification of Stylistics Schools: Point of Departure, Frame of Reference, and Operation Plane

作　　者：徐有志[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学外语学院,开封475001

出　　处：《外国语》2003年第5期53-59,共7页Journal of Foreign Languages

摘　　要：为澄清当前区分文体学流派中的某些不必要的混乱状况,本文建议从出发点、参照系、作业面三方面开展文体学流派区分的讨论。讨论问题,首先要确定一个基点,即出发点。同一著述中应有一个统一的出发点,不能变来变去。就现代文体学整个学科发展的要求来看,以文体观和方法论为出发点对文体学流派进行区分比较合理。它可以对众说纷纭的文体学派进行梳理,又可将不同层次的文体学派明确开来。对文体学流派的确认还有一个范围的问题,即建立参照系问题,须从内涵和外延两个方面对各个流派加以界定,指出它的中心区域和边缘区域,及其与相邻学科和流派的界限。同时,对具体文体学家的流派归属进行分析时还有一个角度的问题,即作业面选择的问题。对众多的文体学者进行归类,把文体学家的代表性论著作为作业面,分析他们的基本主张和实际操作,他们如果合于哪个流派的原型或与哪个学派原型接近,就可将他们划归于哪个学派。To clear up unnecessary confusion over classifying and naming stylistics schools, this paper suggests, first of all, building up and sticking to a basic point, a common point of departure — i.e. to proceed from the basic views on style and the various methodological approaches of stylistic analysis, so as to achieve a unified and stratified treatment of the stylistics schools; secondly, establishing a strict frame of reference for each of the schools, so as to define them in both intensive and extensive terms and distinguish them from other subjects of study as well as from each other; and thirdly, taking prototypical works by respective stylisticians as operation planes and examining their basic views and actual analyses, so as to place them in appropriately designated schools.

关 键 词：文体学流派 出发点 参照系 “形式主义” “结构主义” 

分 类 号：H05[语言文字—语言学]