检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩伟才[1]
机构地区:[1]南开大学哲学系,天津300071
出 处:《内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学版)》2003年第4期50-53,共4页Journal of Inner Mongolia Minzu University:Social Sciences
摘 要:中国是否有逻辑学一直是逻辑学界争论的问题。近代学者从求同的角度出发论证了中国有逻辑 ,但他们的论证有很大的局限性 ;持同样观点的一些当代学者在求同的基础上更加突出了中国逻辑的民族特色。另一些学者从不同角度论证了中国无逻辑的观点。笔者认为 ,中国有古典逻辑 ,但只是处于萌芽状态。从现有的研究成果看 ,持这一观点是比较客观的。It is a question at issue whether there is a logic or not in China. Modern scholars argued that there is a logic in China from the angle of common , but their argument had much limitations; In the present age, The scholars who held the same attitude took more time to argue that the logic in China has it's national feature. Other scholars argued from different factors that there is no logic in China at all. In the author's opinion, classical logic has come into being in China, but only on it's early stage. According to the materials on hand, this is a realistic attitude.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28