对马恩有关文艺与意识形态关系理论的再认识——兼与董学文的有关观点商榷  

Rethinking of Marx and Engels' Theory about the Relationship between Art and Ideology:Discussions on Some of Dong Xuewen's Points

作　　者：边平恕[1] 金菊爱[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江树人大学,浙江杭州310015

出　　处：《浙江树人大学学报》2015年第4期64-70,78,共8页Journal of Zhejiang Shuren University

摘　　要：笼统地把文艺视为意识形态,或认为文艺是与意识形态相适应的社会意识形式,具意识形态性,都把文艺泛意识形态化。这些观点既不符合马克思《政治经济学批判序言》的原意,也不符合中外文学史的实际。马克思在《序言》中明确把文艺视为一定基础上的社会意识形式,其中部分属于意识形态文艺。文学史上存在着大量的非意识形态文艺和带意识形态性文艺。马克思关于意识形态和自由的精神生产区别的观点,说明应使意识形态文艺和自由生产的文艺并行不悖的发展。Generally regarding literary as ideology, or considering art as a form of ideology adapted social ideology with ideological nature, all regard literary ideologized.These views are neither in line with the original intent of Marx's Critique of Political Econo-my Preface nor in line with the reality of foreign literary history.Marx's Preface clearly regarded art as a form of social ideology, some of which belong to the ideological literature.In literary history, there existed many non-ideological arts and arts with ideo-logical nature.Marx's view on the difference between ideology and freedom of spirit production indicates the need for the parallel development of ideological literature and free literary production.

关 键 词：意识形态文艺 非意识形态文艺 带意识形态文艺 自由的文学生产 

分 类 号：I0-02[文学—文学理论]