检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:费安玲[1]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100088
出 处:《江苏行政学院学报》2004年第1期91-96,共6页The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute
摘 要:在我国目前正在制定的物权法中,不动产物权制度是其重要内容之一,而相邻关系与地役权则是不动产物权制度中不可或缺的内容。将具有法学史涵的“地役权”改称为“邻地利用权”的科学依据值得商榷。在立法中,应当关注对不动产相邻关系与地役权的立法体系设计。根据制度的价值判断和业已存在的制度设计,不动产相邻关系与地役权并存模式比较适合我国国情。而现行立法中不动产相邻关系的基本原则和类型划分需要我们进行重新的思考。In the Law of Right in Rem being made in China, system of real property right in rem is one of the key parts while adjacent relation and easement are necessary parts. The scientific basis for the change of 'easement' , which represents the law history, to the 'exploitation right of adjacent land' is open to discussion. In legislation, we should focus on the legislation system design of the adjacent relation of real estate and easement. According to the value judgment of the system and the existing system design, the coexistence of both meets Chinese characteristics. Nevertheless, it requires a new consideration about the fundamental principles and classification of the adjacent relation of real estate in current legislation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15