应对方式、人格特征与应激水平的关系  被引量:98

A Study on Relationship Among Coping, Personality, and Stress

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:马煊[1] 陈龙[1] 裴华[2] 张凤阁[2] 张本[2] 马文有[2] 

机构地区:[1]中国科学院心理研究所,北京100101 [2]开滦集团有限责任公司,河北唐山063000

出  处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2004年第1期48-49,55,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基  金:中国科学院知识创新工程 (KSCX2 -2 -0 3 )资助项目

摘  要:目的 :研究应对方式、人格特征与应激水平的相互关系。方法 :对某企业集团中不同职业群体的 4 74 5名职工采用特质应对量表 (TCSQ)、大五人格问卷 (NEO -FFI)和自制的社会应激事件调查表进行调查。结果 :男性、2 0~ 30岁组、文化程度高的被试 ,其消极应对 (NC)和积极应对 (PC)高 ,应激水平高。NC与人格中的神经质 (N)显著正相关 ,与外倾性 (E)和严谨性 (C)显著负相关 ;PC与N呈显著负相关 ,与E、C、宜人性 (A)显著正相关。逐步回归分析表明 ,影响应激水平的因素依次为NC、N、C、E、PC、A。结论 :人格特征、应对方式与应激水平呈显著相关。性别、年龄、文化程度的差异对应对方式有一定影响。Objective: To Study the correlation among coping styles, personality traits, and stress levels. Methods:4,745 employees sampled from a group corporation were evaluated with a self-developed Social Stressor Questionnaire,NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) and Trait Coping Style Questionnaire (TCSQ) for their stress levels,personality traits and coping styles.Results: The groups of men, 20~30 years old,with higher education level,scored higher on negative coping (NC), positive coping (PC), and overall stress. NC was correlated positively with neuroticism (N), and negatively with extraversion (E) and conscientiousness (C). PC was negatively correlated with N, and positively correlated with E, C, and agreeableness (A). The main factors correlated with stress were in the sequence of NC, N, C, E, PC and A. Conclusion: Coping styles were correlated to gender,age and education level,personality traits and stress levels.

关 键 词:应对方式 人格特征 应激水平 社会应激事件 心理应激 

分 类 号:R395.6[哲学宗教—心理学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象