检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马煊[1] 陈龙[1] 裴华[2] 张凤阁[2] 张本[2] 马文有[2]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院心理研究所,北京100101 [2]开滦集团有限责任公司,河北唐山063000
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2004年第1期48-49,55,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:中国科学院知识创新工程 (KSCX2 -2 -0 3 )资助项目
摘 要:目的 :研究应对方式、人格特征与应激水平的相互关系。方法 :对某企业集团中不同职业群体的 4 74 5名职工采用特质应对量表 (TCSQ)、大五人格问卷 (NEO -FFI)和自制的社会应激事件调查表进行调查。结果 :男性、2 0~ 30岁组、文化程度高的被试 ,其消极应对 (NC)和积极应对 (PC)高 ,应激水平高。NC与人格中的神经质 (N)显著正相关 ,与外倾性 (E)和严谨性 (C)显著负相关 ;PC与N呈显著负相关 ,与E、C、宜人性 (A)显著正相关。逐步回归分析表明 ,影响应激水平的因素依次为NC、N、C、E、PC、A。结论 :人格特征、应对方式与应激水平呈显著相关。性别、年龄、文化程度的差异对应对方式有一定影响。Objective: To Study the correlation among coping styles, personality traits, and stress levels. Methods:4,745 employees sampled from a group corporation were evaluated with a self-developed Social Stressor Questionnaire,NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) and Trait Coping Style Questionnaire (TCSQ) for their stress levels,personality traits and coping styles.Results: The groups of men, 20~30 years old,with higher education level,scored higher on negative coping (NC), positive coping (PC), and overall stress. NC was correlated positively with neuroticism (N), and negatively with extraversion (E) and conscientiousness (C). PC was negatively correlated with N, and positively correlated with E, C, and agreeableness (A). The main factors correlated with stress were in the sequence of NC, N, C, E, PC and A. Conclusion: Coping styles were correlated to gender,age and education level,personality traits and stress levels.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28