论刑事既判力原则的例外  

On the Exception of Criminal Adjudged Force Principle

作　　者：牛振宇[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610065

出　　处：《河北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2004年第1期93-95,共3页Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science)

摘　　要：作为刑事诉讼基本原则,刑事既判力原则存在已久,其基本价值在于对诉讼效益的提高和人权的保障。法理分析证明,刑事既判力原则不绝对排斥刑事再审程序的启动,但我国的刑事再审程序应从既判力原则出发进行重构。刑法的溯及力与刑事既判力存在价值上的暗合,我国刑法的溯及力应扩展到既定判决。As a basic criminal principle, adjudged force pursuits the aim of improving suit able efficiency and protecting human right. The law tenet proves that adjudged force principle dose not absolutely refuse criminal rehearing procedure, but Chinese criminal rehearing procedure should be rebuilt on the principle. There is a common value aim between retroactive effect of criminal law and criminal adjudged force, so retroactive effect of criminal law in China should extend to effective judgment.

关 键 词：中国 刑事诉讼法 刑事既判力原则 刑事再审程序 溯及力 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]