检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李晨清[1]
出 处:《行政法学研究》2004年第1期101-107,共7页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
摘 要:“利害关系”可以被分解为“权益”和“因果关系”两个要素。“权益”要素的判断存在“法律上权益说”和“事实上的权益说” ,但二者在实践中呈融合之势 ;“因果关系”要素操作性不强 ,难以把握 ,在全球呈枯萎之势 ;在“法律上权益说”的构架下 ,“因果关系”有被“权益”吸收的可能。我国宜采用“权益”要素为主、“因果关系”要素为辅的模式解决原告资格问题。The factor of interest of the qualification of the plaintiff can be divided into two factors: rights and causality. Two theories exist when deciding whether one private party has rights: the theory of rights in law and the theory of rights in fact. These theories become to unite increasingly in practice. Contrary to the factor of rights, the fact of causality is hard to grasp. Under the theory of rights in law, it is possible for the factor of causality to be adsorbed into the factor of rights. To solve the problem of the qualification of the plaintiff, we'd better adopt the model with the factor of rights as the main factor while the factor of casualty as the assistant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222