Menopausal depression:comparison of hormone replacement therapy and hormone replacement therapy plus fluoxetine  被引量:8

Menopausal depression:comparison of hormone replacement therapy and hormone replacement therapy plus fluoxetine

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:刘平 何方方 白文佩 郁琦 史蔚 吴宜勇 贺丹军 肖计划 郑晔 廖秦平 

机构地区:[1]Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly Shanghai Representative. Office, Shanghai 200001, China [2]Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China [3]The First Affiliate Hospital, Peking University, Beijing 100034, China [4]Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly Shanghai Representative. Office. Shanghai 200001, China [5]Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China [6]People' s Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210029, China [7]Huaqiao Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630,

出  处:《Chinese Medical Journal》2004年第2期189-194,共6页中华医学杂志(英文版)

摘  要:BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) combined with fluoxetine, with HRT alone, in post-menopausal women suffering from depression. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, parallel trial was applied. HRT was administered to all patients for 2 cycles, with 14 days of estrogen therapy and 14 days of estrogen plus progesterone. Patients who were randomly assigned to the HRT plus fluoxetine group were given fluoxetine in combination with HRT. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Kupperman Menopausal Index (KMI), and Clinical Global Impressions scale were used to measure the efficacy. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-three post-menopausal patients with depression were enrolled in the study. Among them, 120 had at least one post-treatment visit and entered into the statistical analysis. The mean total HAMD scores were significantly lower, and the percentages of HAMD score reductions were higher in the HRT plus fluoxetine Group compared with the HRT Group, after at least 3 weeks of treatment, with an average difference of 5 points at the endpoint. The Clinical Global Impression-Severity and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scores were significantly different in the 2 groups, in favor of the combination therapy. The mean total KMI was significantly lower in the Combination Group compared with the HRT Group, after at least 6 weeks of treatment, with an average 4.5-point difference between the groups. No statistically significant differences were found in most of the adverse events reported in the Combination Group compared with the HRT group, with the exception of 3 symptoms, i.e., dry mouth, loss of appetite, and abdominal distention. They were mild to moderate in severity. Two patients in the HRT group, but none in the combination group, dropped out due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: HRT plus fluoxetine therapy was effective in the treatment of menopausal depression with a satisfactory safety profile.BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) combined with fluoxetine, with HRT alone, in post-menopausal women suffering from depression. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, parallel trial was applied. HRT was administered to all patients for 2 cycles, with 14 days of estrogen therapy and 14 days of estrogen plus progesterone. Patients who were randomly assigned to the HRT plus fluoxetine group were given fluoxetine in combination with HRT. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Kupperman Menopausal Index (KMI), and Clinical Global Impressions scale were used to measure the efficacy. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-three post-menopausal patients with depression were enrolled in the study. Among them, 120 had at least one post-treatment visit and entered into the statistical analysis. The mean total HAMD scores were significantly lower, and the percentages of HAMD score reductions were higher in the HRT plus fluoxetine Group compared with the HRT Group, after at least 3 weeks of treatment, with an average difference of 5 points at the endpoint. The Clinical Global Impression-Severity and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scores were significantly different in the 2 groups, in favor of the combination therapy. The mean total KMI was significantly lower in the Combination Group compared with the HRT Group, after at least 6 weeks of treatment, with an average 4.5-point difference between the groups. No statistically significant differences were found in most of the adverse events reported in the Combination Group compared with the HRT group, with the exception of 3 symptoms, i.e., dry mouth, loss of appetite, and abdominal distention. They were mild to moderate in severity. Two patients in the HRT group, but none in the combination group, dropped out due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: HRT plus fluoxetine therapy was effective in the treatment of menopausal depression with a satisfactory safety profile.

关 键 词:Estrogen Replacement Therapy MENOPAUSE ADULT Comparative Study Depressive Disorder FEMALE FLUOXETINE Humans Middle Aged Research Support  Non-U.S. Gov't Treatment Outcome 

分 类 号:R458.7[医药卫生—治疗学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象