检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学,武汉430074 [2]武汉警官职业学院,武汉430079
出 处:《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2004年第2期22-25,共4页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
摘 要:在现代各国的民法与经济法的规则中 ,往往体现出截然不同的法观念 ,这些差异集中表现在以下五个方面 :公平观、利益观、自由观、效益观和秩序观。本土资源中的民法观念较为匮乏 ,但在现阶段正面临加强的契机 ;本土资源中的经济法观念较为充盈 ,并面临着更加深入的可能。面对民法观念与经济法观念的上述差异 ,立法上应注意在中国民法典制定过程中尽量做到“观念加压 ,内容减负”,而在制定相应的经济法规则时 ,则应尽量做到“观念减负 ,立法提速”The rules of modern civil law and economic law in all countries, usually reflect entirely different concepts of law. These differences mainly manifest in the following aspects: concept of fairness, concept of interest, concept of freedom, concept of benefit and concept of order. There is deficient concept of civil law in native resources, but it is confronted with the chance of being strengthened in present stage; while there is full concept of economic law in native resources, and it is confronted with the possibility of deeper furtherance. In the face of the above differences between concept of civil law and concept of economic law, legislators should try their best to 'strengthen concept and reduce content load' in formulation of China civil code, and to 'reduce concept load and speed legislation' in formulation of relevant rules of economic law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.52