检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈群[1]
出 处:《盐城师范学院学报(人文社会科学版)》2004年第1期13-16,共4页Journal of Yancheng Teachers University(Humanities & Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:非法证据排除规则已成为世界各国通行的刑事诉讼的采证规则之一 ,我国立法对此却没有明确规定。刑事诉讼价值观的差异是非法证据排除规则在我国最终确立的本质障碍 ;而对“以事实为根据”的错误理解和虔诚追求 ,又成为阻却这一原则确立的直接动因。两大法系对非法证据排除规则的规定 ,对我国具有重要的借鉴作用。The exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence has been used in crimainal suits in many countries of the world.But the legislation of our country does not stipulate clearly for that.So the establishing methods are emerging endlessly in academic circles.In China,the chief problem is not how to.establish,but find and get rid of the establishing obstacles.The discrepancy of criminal lawsuit viewpoints of value is the essential obstacle of establishing the rule.The devout pursuit and the worng understanding of 'based on fact'is the direct reason of hindering the establishment of the rule .The contents of the rule of the two departments of the fundamental law have important reference to our country.But we should accord with our national conditions and establish the normal exclusionary rule and the special exclusionary rule step by step.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42