检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学,北京100088 [2]北京市第一中级人民法院,北京100040
出 处:《上海行政学院学报》2003年第3期80-87,共8页The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute
摘 要:长期以来我国的民事诉讼制度当中缺乏系统而又详细的认证规则,既影响了民事审判的质量,也容易滋生司法腐败。最高人民法院于2001年颁布的《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》之第五章是审判系统内部建立有关民事诉讼认证规则的一次积极尝试,一定程度上满足了审判工作的需要。但该章的规定仍有部分不妥之处,需要今后进一步完善。There has been short of systemic and detailed rules of evidence-recognizing for a long time in the civil procedure of our country, which both reduces the quality of civil trial and is prone to cause judicial corruption. The Fifth Chapter of Some Provisions on Civil Evidence passed by the Supreme People's Court in 2001 is a positive attempt to establish the rules of recognizing civil evidence which are used inside the court system, and to a certain extent meets the needs of the practical judicial work. But there are still some problems in this chapter, which should be refined in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3