走私犯罪若干疑难问题之探析——兼评《关于办理走私刑事案件适用法律有关问题的意见》  

An Analysis to Some Disputed Problem about the Crime of Smuggling

作　　者：甘伟宏 余辉胜[2] 

机构地区：[1]重庆学苑律师事务所,重庆400031 [2]西南政法大学,重庆400031

出　　处：《国家检察官学院学报》2003年第5期28-36,共9页Journal of National Prosecutors College

摘　　要：走私犯罪的主观故意只能是直接故意,司法机关对走私人的主观心理状态认定存疑时应允许适度的司法推定,不宜将走私犯罪中的"概括故意"与"认识对象错误"相混淆。海关工作人员受贿又放私构成牵连犯,按从一重罪从重处断。对单位与个人犯走私普通货物物品罪,不能因为主体不同而规定不同的起刑点。在一次走私行为中既走私普通货物物品又有其它特定物品的,属于并发的数罪,应实行数罪并罚。武装掩护走私应为一个独立罪名。The intent in the crime of smuggling can only be direct intent. Judicial officers should be allowed to speculate the smugglers' intent in a way when it is in doubt. The 'general intent' is different from the 'error in object' in the crime of smuggling. Action of a customs officer accepting bribe and giving free rein to smuggling at the same time commits an implicated offence and should be punished on the more serious one of which. The punishment to the crime of smuggling general cargo finished by a unit should be same as to the crime of smuggling general cargo finished by a person. The act of smuggling both general cargo and special cargo is plural crimes and should be punished on the base of principle of joined of punishments for plural crimes. Smuggling shield with arms should be a separate crime.

关 键 词：非典型直接故意 对象错误 起刑点 一束行为 

分 类 号：D924.335[政治法律—刑法学]