检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《临床心身疾病杂志》2004年第1期9-10,共2页Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
摘 要:目的 比较万拉法新与氟西汀治疗老年期抑郁症的疗效及副反应。方法 将62例老年期抑郁症患者随机分为两组,其中万拉法新组32例,予万拉法新150mg·d-1·Bid·PO。氟西汀组30例,予氟西汀40mg·d-1·qd·PO。两组进行为期6w的治疗,并于疗前及疗后1、2、4、6w末采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)及副反应量表(TESS)进行评定。结果 万拉法新组显效率84.4%,氟西汀组显效率83.3%,经卡方检验,两组无显著性差异(P>0.05)。万拉法新较氟西汀起效快(P<0.05)。副反应均较轻微,两组元显著性差异。结论 万拉法新起效快,副反应小,治疗老年期抑郁症疗效好。Objective To compare the efficacies and side effects of venlafaxine and fluoxetine in patients with senile depression. Methods Sixty-two patients with senile depression were randomly divided into 2 groups: venlafaxine group(n=32, 150mg/d,b. i. d. ) and fluoxetine group(n=30, 40mg/d,q. d. ) for 6 weeks. Both groups were assessed by HAMD and TESS before treatment and at the end of 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th week of treatment. Results The effectual rates of the 2 groups were 84. 4%(venlafaxine group) and 83. 3% (fluoxetine group) , which showed no significant difference (X2 test, P>0. 05). Venlafaxine took effect faster than fluoxetine did(P<0. 01). Conclusion Venlafaxine takes effect faster and has better curative effect and milder side effects in patients with senile depression.
分 类 号:R749.41[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.232