检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔健君[1] 姚鹏[1] 王彬[1] 陈培红[2] 郭文力[3] 孟凌新[1]
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学盛京医院疼痛科,沈阳110004 [2]中国医科大学盛京医院麻醉科,沈阳110004 [3]中国医科大学盛京医院放射科,沈阳110004
出 处:《中国疼痛医学杂志》2004年第1期10-11,共2页Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine
摘 要:目的 :探讨经膈脚后入路行腹腔神经丛阻滞的方法、效果及安全性。方法 :18例癌痛病人 ,在CT导引下经膈脚后入路 ,用无水乙醇行毁损性阻滞。观察阻滞后当日、阻滞后 1~ 4周和 5~ 8周三个时段的镇痛有效率及并发症发生情况。结果 :三个时段镇痛有效率分别是 10 0 %、77.78%和6 8.75 % ,有 4例病人血压下降超过阻滞前的 30 % ,处理后恢复正常 ;5例发生乙醇中毒症状 ,3例发生腹泻 ,均自愈。结论 :经膈脚后入路行腹腔神经丛阻滞的方法 ,简便、安全、有效 ,可供临床选用。Objective: To evaluate the process, effectiveness and safety of Computed tomography-guided neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) through post-Crus of diaphragm approach. Method: Gighteen patients with cancer pain were enrolled in this study. Computed tomography-guided alcohol neurolysis was performed through post-Crus of diaphragm approach. Pain relief and Complications were observed during the day of block, the first 1~4 weeks and 5~8 weeks after block. Results: Pain relief was noticed in all 18 patients (100%) during the block day, long-lasting pain relief was 77.78% and 68.75% for the two periods, respectively. Complications included hypotension (more than 30%, compare with that before block) in 4 cases, reversion after treatment. Ethanol poisoning in 5 patients and diarrhea in 3 patients were all spontaneous cure. Conclusions: NCPB through post-Crus of diaphragm approach appears to provide patients with safe and effective pain relief for cancer pain, easy to perform and have no process complication to be used in clinic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117