中意律师在侦查阶段辩护职能之比较  

A Comparison of the Roles of the Defendant Lawyers in Italy and China in the Process of Investigation

作　　者：孙维萍[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学法学院,上海200030

出　　处：《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2004年第2期19-22,共4页Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：1996年 ,我国刑事诉讼法修订以后 ,新法从立法上来说 ,基本上更多地采用了当事人主义的模式 ,这种模式要求控诉方和辩护方要尽量处于平等地位 ,而辩护律师的辩护职能的发挥对达到这一要求和目的具有至关重要的作用。但是 ,当前律师辩护的问题 ,一直是困扰理论界和实务界的一个重要问题。而律师在侦查阶段辩护权的问题 ,更是表现得尤其突出。对此 ,本文针对这一问题 ,与正在进行司法改革的意大利就有关方面进行了比较分析 ,旨在从中寻求有益的经验 。In 1996,China promulgated the new criminal procedure law. From the point of legislation, this law can be seen as a common law, which demands the equality between the prosecution and the defendant. Due to the defendant lawyer's weak role in the criminal procedure, this requirement can not be met. This has become a puzzling problem in theory and in practice. This article will focus on this issue, and compare the Chinese and Italian criminal procedure law, aiming at helping the judicial improvement in China.

关 键 词：刑事诉讼法 辩护权 律师 意大利 中国 侦查阶段 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]