检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王文祖[1]
出 处:《河北法学》2004年第5期139-142,共4页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:我国现行刑事附带民事诉讼制度在立法上规定太笼统 ,相关法律规定不统一 ,关于刑事损害赔偿的救济途径的法律规定不全面 ;在司法实践中当事人的民事诉讼权利易被忽视、民事证据规则不能完全适用、审判人员审判观念存有误区等问题 ,导致刑事附带民事诉讼制度的存废成为讨论焦点。在立法上明确程序选择权、解决民事刑事法律在刑事损害赔偿方面的实体法规定、提高刑事审判人员的综合专业素质 。Our country criminal incidental litigation system stipulate too generally in legislating, different one relevant legal provisions about the relief way of criminal compensation for damage are not overall.The party's civil action right is easy to be ignored in the judicial practice, the civil evidence rule can't be totally applicable to, trying ideas of trying of personal has questions, such as mistaken idea, etc. It becomes the discussing focus that cause existence and abolish of system of civil action. Define the right to choose of the procedure, solve the regulation of entity in criminal compensation for damage of civil, criminal law to make in legislating, improve criminal justice personnel's comprehensive professional quality. It is the system of criminal supplementary civil action in criminal proceedings that is really improved the way.
关 键 词:刑事附带民事诉讼制度 立法缺陷 刑事损害赔偿救济机制 程序选择权 刑事审判人员 业务素质 刑事诉讼
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.25