检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海第二医科大学附属第九人民医院口腔修复科,上海200011
出 处:《口腔材料器械杂志》2004年第2期83-85,共3页Chinese Journal of Dental Materials and Devices
摘 要:目的 通过对比色记录的分析,比较Vita比色板、松风Vintage Halo比色板和电脑比配色 仪之间的相近性和差异性。方法 随机抽取100名年龄在21-24岁的本地在校大学生,由男女两位测试者 使用电脑比配色仪、Vita比色板和松风Vintage Halo比色板对被测试者的左上中切牙进行比色分析。结 果 三种比色方法均以A色调最为集中,占总数的55%以上。其次是D色调占总数20%以上。男女测试者 的选色在A、R、VR系列中无明显差异。结论 电脑比配色仪、Vita比色板、松风Vintage Halo比色板均不 能完全覆盖本地区青年天然中切牙的色度特征,只在A色调系列中重复率较高。Objective This study was designed to explore the compatibility between computerized dental chroma meter and normal dental shade guide in teeth colour matching. Methods one hundred adolescents, with an average age of 22 years, were included for detection of teeth colour reflected by upper left central incisor. Colour detection was conducted by using computer-assisted shade meter system and Vita or Shofu Vintage Halo shade guide. Statistical analysis was applied to evaluate the equivalence between these three approaches. The colour detection was performed independently by two investigators. Results (1) The Hue range A,with the occurrence percentage of 55%, was a dominant manifestation in all the three colour matching approaches, followed by range D with coverage of 20%. (2) No evident difference in colour detection was found between the two investigators. Conclusion The Computer-assisted system and Vita or Shofu-System are reliable in reflecting the teeth colour Hue range of A, and it might not be feasible for them to cover the all Hue range of human teeth colour.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117