检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周佳音[1]
机构地区:[1]同济大学文法学院,上海200433
出 处:《南通师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2004年第2期30-32,共3页Journal of Nantong Teachers College(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:在建立和完善行政公益诉讼的过程中 ,我国目前的原告资格制度已不能适应其要求。进一步拓宽原告资格的范围 ,赋予更多合适的法律主体在社会公益受到侵犯时提起行政公益诉讼的原告资格 ,并在立法上予以明确 ,将有利于更好地限制行政权力的滥用、维护社会公共利益 ,这也是我国行政法治未来发展的必然趋势与选择。In the process of establishing and improving the administrative public welfare lawsuit, the present plaintiff qualification system in our country has not been able to meet the demand. It is an inevitable tendency for the future development of legalizing the administration in our country to further widen the scope of the plaintiff qualification and endow the appropriate legal main bodies with much more administrative public welfare lawsuit in time of the infringement of the social public welfare, and make it clear and definite on legislation. Thus, it will be more efficient to restrict the abuse of the administrative power and defend the public interests of the society.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15