国际共运传统模式的危机与中苏论战  

The traditional mode of international Communism Movement and Sino-USSR Dispute

作　　者：李明斌[1,2,3,4,5,6] 

机构地区：[1]信阳师范学院马列所 [2]国际共产主义 [3]模式 [4]"一个中心" [5]"一个统一纲领" [6]"一条总路线"

出　　处：《信阳师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2004年第3期6-11,共6页Journal of Xinyang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金2001年重点项目"社会主义发展的历史进程研究"(01AKS003);河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目"中国共产党对待资本主义问题的经验教训研究"(2003-GH-095)

摘　　要：国际共产主义一直有一个固定的模式,这一模式主要表现为国际共产主义要有一个中心,要有一个统一的纲领和总路线。到20世纪中叶,随着各无产阶级政党的成熟并领导本国人民取得政权,传统国际共产主义模式已不适应形势的发展,而前苏联共产党还要按照自己的意志继续维护旧的模式,遭到中国共产党等党的反对。中国共产党虽然反对前苏联共产党搞"老子党",但在一定意义上也以自己的理解来维护这一模式。两党为此发生了分歧,并在一些关键问题上进行了论战。经过中苏论战和世界形势的进一步发展,各国党逐渐认识到国际共产主义不能再有一个中心、一个统一的纲领和总路线,国际共产主义传统模式被打破,各国开始根据自己的国情走独立自主的发展道路。There existed a set mode in the international Communism Movement characterizing one center, one united guiding principle and one general line. In the middle of the 20th century, with the maturity of all proletariat parties and their beginning to lead their own people to win political power, the traditional international Communism Movement mode failed to suit the situational development. The Chinese Communist party opposed the USSR Communist Party as a 'paternal party', but actually safeguarded its mode in a way according to own understanding, from which the differences between the two parties emerged, and they disputed on such issues as the central problem, united guiding principle and general line, etc.. After the Sino-USSR Dispute and the world situation development, all the parties of different countries came to realize that there should not exist one center, one united guiding principle or one general line. Then the traditional mode was broken, and all countries began to walk on their own independent road to development.

关 键 词：中苏论战 国际共产主义 模式 “一个中心” “一个统一纲领” “一条总路线” 

分 类 号：D181[政治法律—政治学]