检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国肺癌杂志》2004年第3期230-235,共6页Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
摘 要:目的 评估肺癌患者的生命质量及探究与之相关的影响因素。方法 自 2 0 0 2年 1月 1日至 12月 3 1日采用EORTCQLQ问卷表调查了 10 6例肺癌患者。影响生命质量因素的差异程度经t检验及单变量方差检验处理。结果 本研究组肺癌患者的生命质量指标均低于参考值。年轻、男性及已婚组患者的生命质量较好。低文化程度及低收入患者的生命质量较差。小细胞型、晚期及有转移的肺癌患者生命质量最差。接受治疗的患者生命质量有不同程度的下降 ,其中手术治疗者生命质量最好。结论 该研究结果对建立中国肺癌患者生命质量的评判标准及临床医生、理论研究者和政府官员均有重要的指导意义。Objective To evaluate the quality of life (QoL) of lung cancer patients and to investigate the differences in QoL with respect to social and medical characteristics. Methods Structured questionnaires (EORTC QLQ C30 and QLQ LC13) were used in 106 consecutive lung cancer patients for data collection during January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002. The t test and one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare the differences in QoL at a 5% level of significance. Results The QoL of lung cancer patients were worse than reference value. The QoL of young, male and married patient groups was better than that in old, female and single groups. The QoL in patients with lower education or income was worse than that in patients with high education and income. Small cell lung cancer patients showed poorer QoL than non small cell lung cancer patients did. The locally advanced or metastatic patients had worse QoL. All the kinds of treatments could worsen the QoL, however, the patients receiving surgical treatment had best QoL. Conclusion The results suggest that the establishment of QoL judgment standard in Chinese lung cancer patients might be useful for clinicians, researchers and policy makers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3