检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《临床精神医学杂志》2004年第3期143-144,共2页Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
摘 要:目的 :探讨西酞普兰治疗急性期老年抑郁症的有效性及安全性。 方法 :收集各类抑郁急性发作、年龄≥ 6 0岁的患者进行西酞普兰和阿米替林单盲对照治疗 ,治疗 8周。疗效及安全性评定采用17项汉密顿抑郁量表和副反应量表。 结果 :70例完成观察 ,其中西酞普兰组 34例 ,阿米替林组 36例。治疗第 2周时 ,西酞普兰组有效率显著较高。在第 8周时两组疗效差异无显著性。西酞普兰组的不良反应明显较少。 结论 :西酞普兰见效较快 ,不良反应较少 ,适合于老年抑郁症特别是伴有躯体疾病患者的急性期治疗。Objective:To study the efficacy and tolerability of citalopram in elderly with acute depression. Method:Patients at least 60 years old with major depression were eligible.They were randomized to receive citalopram or amitriptyline in sequence.Efficacy was assessed with the Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAMD) and tolerability was assessed from rating scale for adverse effect. Results:70 patients were studied,34 with citalopram and 36 with amitriptyline were included in the efficacy analysis.Differences favoring citalopram were observed for the mean change from baseline in HAMD-17 score at 2 weeks after the treatment,but without significant difference at 8 weeks after the treatment.The citalopram group also showed less adverse effects than the amitriptyline group. Conclusion:Citalopram had faster on effect,also demonstrated a better tolerability profile and represents a valuable option for the treatment of acute depression in elderly patients and especially suit to the patients with somatic diseases.
分 类 号:R749.4[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4