心理健康的测量:自尊量表和情感量表的比较  被引量:37

Assessing Psychological Well-being: Comparison between Self-esteem Scale and PAS & NAS

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:李虹[1] 

机构地区:[1]清华大学教育研究所,北京100084

出  处:《心理发展与教育》2004年第2期75-79,共5页Psychological Development and Education

基  金:全国教育科学十五规划重点课题 (ABA 0 1 0 0 1 2 )子课题

摘  要:对两个西方常用的心理健康测量工具:Rosenberg的《自尊量表》和Bradburn的《正性情感量表和负性情感量表》进行心理测量学指标的比较。被试取自北京市三所高校的一至三年级大学生,共1142人。两个分研究的结果均表明:《自尊量表》的各项心理测量学指标都好于《正性情感量表和负性情感量表》。作为心理健康的测量工具,《自尊量表》在多数情况下比《正性情感量表和负性情感量表》更有效。The purpose of the study was to compare the psychometric properties between two popular measures for psychological well-being: Rosenberg's Self-esteem Scale and Bradburn's Positive Affect Scale (PAS) and Negative Affect Scale (NAS). The sample consisted of 1142 college students from first year to third year at three universities in Beijing. The study consisted of two different studies. Study one included 354 participants, and study two included 788 participants. Results of both studies indicated that the psychometric properties of Self-esteem Scale were better than those of PAS & NAS. Thus, the study suggested that Self-esteem Scale as a measure for psychological well-being was more appropriate than PAS & NAS.

关 键 词:心理健康 自尊量表 情感量表 心理测量指标 

分 类 号:B841.7[哲学宗教—基础心理学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象