检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李虹[1]
出 处:《心理发展与教育》2004年第2期75-79,共5页Psychological Development and Education
基 金:全国教育科学十五规划重点课题 (ABA 0 1 0 0 1 2 )子课题
摘 要:对两个西方常用的心理健康测量工具:Rosenberg的《自尊量表》和Bradburn的《正性情感量表和负性情感量表》进行心理测量学指标的比较。被试取自北京市三所高校的一至三年级大学生,共1142人。两个分研究的结果均表明:《自尊量表》的各项心理测量学指标都好于《正性情感量表和负性情感量表》。作为心理健康的测量工具,《自尊量表》在多数情况下比《正性情感量表和负性情感量表》更有效。The purpose of the study was to compare the psychometric properties between two popular measures for psychological well-being: Rosenberg's Self-esteem Scale and Bradburn's Positive Affect Scale (PAS) and Negative Affect Scale (NAS). The sample consisted of 1142 college students from first year to third year at three universities in Beijing. The study consisted of two different studies. Study one included 354 participants, and study two included 788 participants. Results of both studies indicated that the psychometric properties of Self-esteem Scale were better than those of PAS & NAS. Thus, the study suggested that Self-esteem Scale as a measure for psychological well-being was more appropriate than PAS & NAS.
分 类 号:B841.7[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.91.115