不断革命的科学发展模式:基于证伪主义的解读  

The Constantly Revolutionary Mode of Scientific Development: An Interpretation Based on Falsificationism

作　　者：叶梓岚 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学马克思主义学院,重庆

出　　处：《哲学进展》2023年第2期499-504,共6页Advances in Philosophy

摘　　要：经过科学哲学思维的一次转向,科学发展模式由静态的、线性积累的形态进阶为动态的、不断革命的,形成了以证伪主义为引领的新一代科学观。基于波普尔证伪主义,库恩提出了“范式”核心的科学观;拉卡托斯在两者基础上进而提出科学研究纲领理论,消解了科学实现连续性发展的障碍。以证伪主义为中心,对比以上几种皆具革命精神的科学观,可知在划界标准、论证逻辑、模式特征上各有异同,三者共同构成这一阶段科学发展模式的核心内容。但在科学实践哲学的观点审视下,包括证伪主义在内的不断革命之科学发展模式在归纳、划界等方面还存在局限。After a turn of philosophical thinking of science, the mode of scientific development has been advanced from static and linear accumulation to dynamic and constantly revolutionary, and a new generation of scientific view led by falsificationism has been formed. Based on Popper’s falsificationism, Kuhn proposed the core scientific view of “paradigm”. Lakatos then put forward the scientific research program theory on the basis of the two and removed the obstacles to the continuous development of science. Centering on falsificationism and comparing the above scientific views with revolutionary spirit, it can be seen that there are differences and similarities in demarcation criteria, argumentation logic and mode characteristics, which together constitute the core content of the scientific development mode at this stage. However, under the view of philosophy of scientific practice, the scientific development model of continuous revolution including falsificationism still has limitations in the aspects of induction and demarcation.

关 键 词：科学哲学 科学发展模式 证伪主义 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]