劳丹“研究传统”与库恩“范式”比较研究  

A Comparative Study of Laudan’s “Research Tradition” and Kuhn’s “Paradigm”

作　　者：乌力吉[1] 

机构地区：[1]内蒙古师范大学科学技术史研究院,内蒙古 呼和浩特

出　　处：《哲学进展》2023年第4期815-819,共5页Advances in Philosophy

摘　　要：库恩的“范式”和劳丹的“研究传统”作为科学哲学历史主义的主要概念存在着很多异同之处,作为非直线型累积进步观有相似性,而对于科学进步的观念及分析的不一致也有不同之处。本文通过以劳丹“研究传统”和库恩的“范式”为中心,评述他们异同之处。Kuhn’s “Paradigm” and Loudan’s “Research tradition”, as the main concepts of historicism of philosophy of science, have many similarities and differences. As a non-linear view of cumulative progress, there are similarities, and there are differences in the concept and analysis of scientific progress. In this paper, Laudan’s “research tradition” and Kuhn’s “paradigm” as the center, comments on their similarities and differences.

关 键 词：劳丹 研究传统 库恩 范式 科学进步 

分 类 号：N02[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]