检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:苏婷婷
机构地区:[1]上海师范大学哲学与法政学院,上海
出 处:《哲学进展》2024年第1期159-163,共5页Advances in Philosophy
摘 要:在新时代的发展下,随着科技的高速发展,科学史和科技哲学的研究有着不可或缺的作用。作为科学史研究中十分重要的研究人员——戴维•林德伯格,尤其是对中世纪科学史研究上,林德伯格是权威的存在。《西方科学的起源》是科学史研究中举足轻重的一本教科书,是科学史和科学哲学研究者的必读书籍之一,但纵观科技哲学界对这本书的评述却寥寥无几,而现有的研究者大多针对文中的局部内容讲解或部分观点的分析,对本书背后的林德伯格本人的科技哲学探索脉络无人梳理。本文通过对此书作者背景、书的内容构架及内部逻辑进行分析,力求从作者的履历、其所著文章的梳理以及作者对本书目录和内容的编排逻辑三个维度来探求林德伯格书写此书的意图,从而深入探究他对科技哲学思考的出发点和内部逻辑。With the rapid development of science and technology in the new era, the study of history of science and philosophy of science and technology plays an indispensable role. As a very important re-searcher in the study of the history of science—David Lindbergh, especially in the study of the his-tory of science in the Middle Ages, Lindbergh is an authority. The Origin of Western Science is an important textbook in the study of the history of science and one of the must-read books for re-searchers in the history of science and philosophy of science. However, there are very few comments on this book in the field of philosophy of science and technology, and most of the existing researchers focus on the explanation of partial content or the analysis of partial viewpoints. Lindbergh’s own philosophical exploration of science and technology behind this book has not been combed. By analyzing the author’s background, the content structure and the internal logic of the book, this paper tries to explore Lindbergh’s intention to write this book from three dimensions: The author’s history, the review of his articles and the arrangement logic of the contents and contents of the book, so as to deeply explore the starting point and internal logic of his thinking on philosophy of science and technology.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7