检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋新宇
机构地区:[1]广西大学马克思主义学院,广西 南宁
出 处:《哲学进展》2024年第10期2565-2571,共7页Advances in Philosophy
摘 要:在中国特色社会主义新时代,我国在全球生态环境治理领域展现出了独特的中国智慧和方案。然而,中国的生态话语在国际传播方面仍然受到多方限制,在国际舞台上时常陷入难以辩解的话语困境,迫切需要展开对话,消除冲突。哈贝马斯所倡导的交往行为理论为多元文化之间的对话提供了有益的视角。文化对话需要紧密联系生活世界,并坚守交往理性的基本原则,才能在国际对话中提高中国生态话语的影响力。基于交往理性的启发,可以通过平衡信息呈现、搭建跨文化交流的对话平台,以及提供具有普遍性的生态实践方式进行互助式对话等方式提高中国生态话语的国际影响力。In the new era of socialism with Chinese characteristics, China has demonstrated unique wisdom and solutions in the field of global ecological governance. However, China’s ecological discourse faces multiple constraints in international communication and often finds itself in a discourse dilemma on the global stage, where it struggles to articulate its position. This situation urgently calls for dialogue to eliminate conflicts. Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action offers a valuable perspective for facilitating dialogue among diverse cultures. Effective cultural dialogue must closely relate to the lifeworld and adhere to the fundamental principles of communicative rationality in order to enhance the influence of China’s ecological discourse in international dialogues. Inspired by communicative rationality, China can enhance its international ecological discourse by balancing the presentation of information, creating platforms for cross-cultural dialogue, and promoting universally applicable ecological practices through cooperative dialogue.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7