检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陆子纯
机构地区:[1]广西大学马克思主义学院,广西 南宁
出 处:《哲学进展》2024年第12期3431-3437,共7页Advances in Philosophy
摘 要:本文深入探讨了波洛克提出的“国家资本主义”概念及其对批判理论中经济分析的深远影响与历史局限。波洛克借助马克思主义的危机理论,批判性地分析了民族社会主义德国的经济政策,将市场的无政府状态置于分析的核心,试图为危机的起因及其对经济秩序的影响提供答案。尽管这一理论在法兰克福学派内部引发争议,但波洛克对资本主义形态变化的深刻洞察与批判性分析仍不可忽视。波洛克的研究促使批判理论转向资本主义内部关系探讨,其理论的局限性也为后续研究提供了重要的反思空间。本文还分析了波洛克对霍克海默、阿多诺等学者的影响,澄清了早期批判理论家在经济分析上的误解。This paper delves into Pollock’s concept of “state capitalism” and its profound influence and historical limitations on economic analysis within critical theory. Drawing on Marxist crisis theory, Pollock critically analyzed the economic policies of National Socialist Germany, placing the market’s anarchic tendencies at the center of his examination in an attempt to explain the causes of crises and their impact on economic order. While his theory sparked debates within the Frankfurt School, Pollock’s deep insights into the transformations of capitalism and his critical analysis remain significant. His work prompted critical theory to shift its focus to the internal relations of capitalism, and the limitations of his theory offer valuable space for further reflection. This paper also examines Pollock’s influence on scholars such as Horkheimer and Adorno, clarifying misconceptions regarding the early critical theorists’ approaches to economic analysis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222