检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫鑫源
出 处:《哲学进展》2025年第2期8-14,共7页Advances in Philosophy
摘 要:格劳孔挑战作为苏格拉底正义观立场的反驳论述之一出现于《理想国》第二卷,其实质在于对正义内在价值的深入探讨,同时揭示正义作为理论之善在现实实践中面临的困境。格劳孔挑战的独特价值体现在多方面,它推动苏格拉底更为系统、清晰地论证正义价值,一定程度上消解了色拉叙马霍斯“强权即正义”的观点,并促使苏格拉底转变论证视角,从个人正义转向国家正义,引发理想国模型的构建,为全面理解柏拉图的正义观提供了关键视角与重要依据。Glaucon’s challenge appears in Book II of The Republic as one of the counterarguments to Socrates’ stance on justice. Its essence lies in an in-depth exploration of the intrinsic value of justice, and at the same time, it reveals the predicament that justice, as a theoretical good, faces in practical reality. The unique value of Glaucon’s challenge is manifested in many aspects. It prompts Socrates to more systematically and clearly demonstrate the value of justice, to a certain extent, dispels Thrasymachus’ view that “might is right”, and urges Socrates to shift the perspective of argumentation from individual justice to state justice, triggering the construction of the model of the ideal state. It provides a crucial perspective and important basis for a comprehensive understanding of Plato’s concept of justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145