大学生自我同一性发展与拖延的相关及团体干预研究  

A Study of Correlation between College Students’ Self-Identity Development and Procrastination and Group Intervention

作　　者：路翠艳[1] 潘芳 高媛媛[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学学生心理健康教育与咨询中心,山东 济南 [2]山东大学齐鲁医学院医学心理学与伦理学系,山东 济南

出　　处：《心理学进展》2021年第9期2241-2249,共9页Advances in Psychology

摘　　要：目的:探讨大学生自我同一性发展与拖延的相关关系,并检测整合性团体干预方案对拖延的改善作用。方法:使用自我同一性地位量表、Aitken拖延问卷收集了499名大学生的施测数据,进行相关分析。在此基础上,招募拖延高分被试60人并分为两组,对干预组(30人)使用一套整合性团体干预方案进行8周、每周2小时的干预,而对照组(30人)未接受任何干预。干预前后使用Aitken拖延问卷、一般自我效能感及自我同一性地位量表进行测试。结果:自我同一性地位(r = −0.30, P 【0.01)及三个维度得分(r = −0.32, 0.12, 0.22, P 【0.01)均与拖延得分呈显著负相关。与对照组相比,团体干预后干预组拖延得分显著降低(P 【0.01),一般自我效能感显著提高(P 【0.01),自我同一性地位发生了明显的改变,表现为50%的被干预者自我同一性等级得到了提升,以及自我同一性三个维度得分均显著增高(P 【0.01)。结论:大学生自我同一性发展状态与拖延行为表现为显著负相关;该整合性团体方案可有效改善拖延,推动内在心理的发展。Objective: To explore correlational relationship between college students’ self-identity develop-ment and procrastination and examine the efficacy of integrated group intervention program in improving procrastination. Methods: Self-identity status scale and Aitken procrastination ques-tionnaire were used to collect the test data of 499 college students for correlation analysis. Fur-thermore, 60 subjects with high procrastination scores were enrolled and divided two groups, the intervention group (30 subjects) were intervened by an integrated group intervention program for 8 weeks and 2 hours a week, and the control group (30 subjects) did not receive any intervention. All subjects were assessed with Aitken procrastination questionnaire, general self-efficacy inventory and self-identity status scale before and after the intervention. Results: Self-identity status (r = −0.30, P <0.01) and three dimensions scores (r = −0.32, 0.12, 0.22, P <0.01) were significantly negatively correlated with procrastination scores. Compared with the control group, the procrastination score of the intervention group was significantly lower (P <0.01) after the group intervention, and the general self-efficacy was significantly improved (P <0.01), and the status of self-identity was significantly changed with a promotion of the self-identity grade of 50% subjects received intervention and three dimensions scores (P <0.01). Conclusion: The development of College Students’ self-identity is significantly negatively correlated with the performance of procrastination. The integrated group intervention program can effectively improve procrastination and promote the development of internal psychology.

关 键 词：自我同一性 拖延 团体干预 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]