检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广州医科大学卫生管理学院,广东 广州 [2]广州医科大学精神卫生学院,广东 广州
出 处:《心理学进展》2023年第4期1524-1533,共10页Advances in Psychology
摘 要:目的:研究气质类型对个体识别基本情绪面孔的影响。方法:采用问卷调查,分析不同的气质类型对个体识别基本情绪面孔的差异;采用了陈会昌气质类型量表并结合面孔情绪识别题,随机选取了84名大学生为研究对象,探析个体的气质类型对识别基本情绪面孔的影响以及是否存在本质差异,进行4 (气质类型:胆汁质/多血质/黏液质/抑郁质) × 6 (面孔情绪:厌恶/悲伤/恐惧/愤怒/平静/愉悦)的两因素混合实验设计。结果:四种气质类型总体在愉悦表情的识别上准确率最高,在平静表情的识别上准确率最低。结论:四种气质类型在基本情绪面孔识别上存在不一致的差异表现。Objective: To study the effect of temperament type on individuals’ recognition of basic emotional faces. Methods: A questionnaire was used to analyze the difference of various temperament types on individuals’ recognition of basic emotional faces;The Chen Huichang Temperament Type Inventory was used and combined with the Facial Emotion Recognition Question, eighty-four college students were randomly selected to investigate the effect of individual temperament types on the recognition of basic emotional faces and whether there was an essential difference. A two-factor mixed experimental design of 4 (temperament types: bilious/polycytic/mucus/depressive) × 6 (face emotions: disgust/ sadness/fear/anger/calm/pleasure) was conducted. Results: The four temperament types overall had the highest accuracy in the recognition of pleasant expressions and the lowest accuracy in the recognition of calm expressions. Conclusion: Individuals with different temperament types showed diversity in the recognition of basic emotional faces.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3