检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《心理学进展》2023年第8期3370-3376,共7页Advances in Psychology
摘 要:文章探讨了人们对不同对象行为的道德评价差异以及与其心智知觉之间的关系。结果显示,相同的道德行为中,人们对警察的道德赞赏程度显著低于普通人,而对于不道德行为,人们对警察的谴责程度显著高于普通人。此外,人们认为警察在感受性维度上较普通人更弱,但在能动性维度上更优秀。进一步的分析发现,心智知觉与道德行为评价之间存在显著关系,当被试对目标对象的感受性和能动性知觉较高时,对其道德行为的评价更为积极。然而,对不道德行为的评价仅在目标对象为警察时受心智知觉影响。本研究揭示了人们在道德评价和心智知觉方面的认知差异,对于理解人们对不同目标对象行为的态度具有重要意义。This study examines the evaluative differences in moral and immoral behavior towards different objects and their relationship with mind perception. The results indicate that, for the same moral behavior, individuals show significantly lower moral appreciation towards police officers compared to ordinary individuals. Conversely, for immoral behavior, individuals express significantly higher condemnation towards police officers than towards ordinary individuals. Furthermore, police offic-ers are perceived as weaker in sensitivity dimension but superior in initiative dimension compared to ordinary individuals. Further analyses reveal a significant association between mind perception and moral behavior evaluation, whereby participants with higher levels of sensitivity and initiative perception towards the target objects tend to exhibit more positive evaluations of their moral be-havior. However, the evaluation of immoral behavior is only influenced by mind perception when the target object is a police officer. In summary, this study sheds light on the cognitive differences in moral evaluation and mind perception, providing important insights into understanding attitudes towards behaviors exhibited by different target objects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15